|
PRATOLA PELIGNA
by Sestino Casasanta
Corriere Peligno/Gente Italica
London, Ontario, Canada
PRATULAE
"Terra Pratulorum"
(LATIN PRATULUM = SMALL MEADOW)
copyright© by Sestino Casasanta
Corriere Peligno/Gente Italica
London, Ontario; Canada
Certain information to Pratulae's ancient origins
is unknown, and as far as we know Pratulae was not ever mentioned
before or during the Roman domination.
The first referral of Pratulae was found in the
Chronicon Vulturnense written by Giovanni the abbot of the Monastery
of S. Vincenzo al Volturno, dated just prior to the year 1.000 A.D.
(without taking anything away from those cities with a legend, we
would like to point out that Pratulae had the misfortune for not
having a local historian that could relate this town to some kind
of legend or fairy tale).
Today having access to a book written by a Russian
archeologist named Ivan Zvetaieff titled "Italics Inscriptions
- Paeligni Inscriptions" (translated to the Italian language
by Maria Svetloff Marzii-Rasla 1906), and in the book's preface,
we find that Zvetaieff refers to the Paeligni Tombstones Inscriptions.
He has written: "... only in the year 1877, different Paeligni
inscriptions began to come to light, one after the other in the
territories of the ancient Corfinium and in the nearby cities of
Sulmona, Pratola and in the other's surrounding towns...".
Prior to 1877 most of the tombstones recovered were inscribed with
Osco-Sabellian characters. Zvataieff dedicates almost five pages
to one of the tombstones uncovered near Pratola, that as we are
aware, are preserved in the old city hall (vecchio palazzo comunale).
The text reads:"MEDIX*ATICVS /BIAM* IOCATIN/P.
SADRIES*T./V. POPDIS*T."
He went on to say that experts from Paris, Bonn
and Rome who took interest in the above inscription had agreed to
its authenticity, but, they were still unable to resolve the meaning
of the complete text, and as far as we know, today, its meaning
still remains a mystery.
But if the ancient gravestones were recovered
near Pratola, then without any doubt we can assume that an "Oppidum"
or "Pagus" (town or village) with a nearby cemetery was
in existence, at the site where Pratola lies today, and in the historic
times must have played a prominent role in the life of the Paelignians
and the Paeligna Valley.
Then what was the name of this site which had
its own (sepulcretum) cemetery? Was this place within the perimeter
of the ancient metropolis of Corfinium?
We have researched some writings from the ancient
and modern historians. Here are some of our findings:
Diodorus Siculus (I. century B.C.): (Corfinium)
"... greatest and most famous...".
Strabo: " ... great Paelignian metropolis...".
"...350 temples existed in Corfinium...".
Caius Julius Caesar: "Commentaries on the
Civil Wars" (49 B.C.): "...Inside the walls of Corfinium
were 19,000 soldiers recruited by Domitius..."
Percky Moro: "... the ancient Corfinium must
have been built, in the area, where Pratola lies today ..."
(theory discarded by A. De Nino)
Marco Bonocore: "... the focal point of Corfinium
was further south from where, today, there lies the town of Corfinio."
Antonio De Nino: "... during glorious times
Corfinium had one hundred thousand "fuochi" households
..."
Colarossi-Mancini: (the Paeligni) "... they
were known for their fidelity to their own spouse and for having
numerous children...".
Map of the Peligna Region: It is less than four
kms from the ruins of Corfinium (south of the Basilica of San Pelino)
to Pratola.
From the writings of the above historians, we
have reached the following conclusion:
CORFINIUM: great and most famous / Paelignian
metropolis / (with) 350 temples / (and) in the glorious time had
one hundred thousand households / (with an) abundance of children.
/ (In 49 B.C..) Domitius had 19.000 soldiers inside the city's walls
(therefore Corfinium had to be a fairly big city).
From the ancient site to Pratola there is a distance
of about 4 km.. Even if we concede, like our fellow townsman historian-archaeologist
Antonio De Nino, that the Percky Moro theory is erroneous, it is
not improper to declare without any doubt that the site of "Dentro
la Terra" was the south-east fortress in the periphery of the
metropolis of Corfinium, to guard the green and fertile meadows
(Latin: Pratulorum).
Therefore this may well be the reason why Pratulae
was never mentioned prior to the year 997 A.D. To help us solve
the enigma, there is the statement of Sigibert of Gembloux: "...
In the year 965 A.D. the magnificent city (Corfinium) had completely
vanished...". Also according to Don Settimio Ottavi in his
book "Prezza" he wrote: "... After Corfinium was
reduced to a small village without the defensive walls, the nearby
Villa Carrena (Prezza) was called Praesidium Corfinii. This means
that not only the majority of the population had left. but also,
the military garrison had abandoned Corfinium. From other "historical
notes" we learn that: "... After the fall of the Roman
Empire, this area was invaded by barbarians who devastated the Italic
and Roman cities. The population took refuge near castles and monasteries,
usually in high land, creating the characteristic walled and fortified
villages of the area, and forming the nuclei of later urban development...".
The above statements substantiate our belief more
firmly, that after the disappearance of the most famous Paelignian's
city, the population spread in the surrounding location and many
folks established to the fertile land in the south. Even today from
aerial photographs, one can still identify the perimeter of the
old fortress in the historic site of "Dentro la Terra"
which remained intact to survive, and for the fertile soil in the
surrounding was given the Latin name of Pratulum = small meadow,
and afterward changed to Terra Pratulorum and later to Castrum of
Pratulae.
«
Back
|